Enhancing San Jacinto's Resilience to Climate Change Impacts

San Jacinto City Council

595 S San Jacinto Ave 

San Jacinto, CA. 92583

Dear Members of the San Jacinto City Council, 

I am writing to express my concerns about the increasing threat of climate change and its potential impacts on our community, particularly in light of recent devastating wildfires and extreme weather events across California, including the significant losses experienced in Los Angeles County, as highlighted in a recent MyNewsLA.com article https://mynewsla.com/government/2025/02/13/la-county-launches-blue-ribbon-commission-on-climate-action-and-fire-recovery-2. This article discussed the formation of the LA County Blue Ribbon Commission on Climate Action and Fire Safe Recovery, which underscores the urgency of proactive measures to protect our communities. 

Like many other areas in California, San Jacinto faces risks related to wildfire, drought, and extreme heat. Our city must proactively mitigate these risks and enhance our resilience to climate change impacts. Inspired by the LA County Commission's focus areas, I would like to offer the following recommendations for your consideration:

1. Strengthening Fire Safety: 

• Review and Update Building Codes: I urge the council to review and update San Jacinto's building codes to ensure they incorporate the latest fire-resistant materials and construction techniques. This will help protect new and existing structures from wildfire threats. 

• Promote Defensible Space: The city should implement community education programs to encourage homeowners to create defensible space around their properties. Exploring incentives for homeowners who implement these measures could further enhance community participation.

• Enhance Vegetation Management: I recommend reviewing the city's vegetation management plan, particularly in high-risk areas. Adequate funding and resources should be allocated to ensure effective vegetation management practices.

• Improve Community Alert Systems: It is critical to ensure San Jacinto has a robust and reliable system for notifying residents of fire dangers and evacuation orders. Regular testing and community outreach are essential. 

2. Ensuring Equitable Recovery:

 • Address Affordable Housing Needs: The council should consider policies that support the development and preservation of affordable housing to minimize displacement in the event of a disaster. This is crucial for ensuring a just and equitable recovery for all residents.

• Explore Insurance Access Solutions: I encourage the city to explore ways to help residents access affordable insurance, particularly in high-risk areas. This might involve partnerships with insurance providers or advocating for state-level solutions.

• Support Vulnerable Populations: It is essential to develop a specific plan to support vulnerable populations in San Jacinto (e.g., the elderly and low-income people) during and after a disaster. This plan should address their unique needs, including evacuation assistance and access to resources.

• Establish Community Resource Centers: Establishing community resource centers that can provide support and information to residents during recovery is a valuable investment in community resilience.

These recommendations will help us better prepare for the challenges of climate change and ensure a more resilient future for our community. I would welcome discussing these issues further with the council and other community members.

Thank you for your time and consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Eric Devezin

Fighting for justice in public policy, and in our society.

Trump hasn’t even been in office for two weeks and he, Vice President Vance, and their extremist enablers have already wreaked havoc on our political system—with lawless efforts to execute the white supremacist, misogynistic, and racist plans they laid out in their Project 2025 playbook. We can’t be complacent.

A Climate Plan for San Jacinto: Building a Sustainable Future

San Jacinto, situated in Riverside County, California, faces a range of climate-related challenges, including extreme heat, wildfires, drought, and air pollution. To address these issues and create a more sustainable future, our community must implement a comprehensive climate plan. The plan should prioritize both mitigation and adaptation strategies. Mitigation efforts aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to slow climate change. This can be achieved through the promotion of renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power, and by improving energy efficiency in homes, businesses, and public buildings. Additionally, encouraging the adoption of electric vehicles and expanding charging infrastructure can contribute to emissions reduction. Adaptation strategies focus on preparing for and responding to the impacts of climate change. These include water conservation measures, emergency preparedness plans, urban forestry initiatives, and infrastructure upgrades to enhance resilience. By implementing these measures, San Jacinto can mitigate the negative effects of climate change and protect its residents. Equity must be prioritized to ensure that the climate plan benefits all community members. Environmental justice should be a guiding principle, ensuring climate action addresses the disproportionate impacts on low-income communities and communities of color. Engaging San Jacinto residents in developing and implementing the plan is crucial to ensuring that it meets their needs and reflects their priorities. #GoSanjacinto #sanjacinto #sanjacintoca #sanjacintocollege #sanjacintomountains To effectively implement a climate plan, San Jacinto will need to form partnerships with local, state, and federal governments, non-profit organizations, businesses, and residents. Funding for climate initiatives can be obtained through grants, public-private partnerships, and local government budgets. San Jacinto can give its citizens a more resilient and sustainable future by enacting a thorough climate strategy and addressing climate change head-on.

New Southern California rule would require dramatic reduction in rail yard pollution

New Southern California rule would require dramatic reduction in rail yard pollution - Trains

Government Solutions: A Public Administration Perspective on Openness and Truth-Telling

In the highly complex realm of public administration, trust in the government is the fundamental currency. Citizens should believe that their public institutions act in their best interests based on reliable information. This is precisely when the paramount imperative of cultivating a culture of openness in public administration should take on its greatest urgency. Why Openness Matters Psychological Safety: Employees who feel safe enough to speak up about their concerns and contribute new ways of doing things promote more responsive and honest public service. Diversity of voices: Because people are present and tolerate differing viewpoints, many more voices are heard and understood. Better policies and solutions are developed to address the needs of the whole society. Open Dialogue with Citizens: When decision-makers engage in dialogue and openly discuss the ‘why’, citizens are more willing to be involved and work on developing solutions. From Openness to Truth-Telling A culture that is open invites and favors truth-telling. Here’s how public administration can help it flourish: Transparency in Action: Publishing data, reports, and decision-making processes in a way that is open and easily accessible allows citizens to hold their government accountable. Collaboration and Open Dialogue: Build a culture of regular town halls, public forums, and online QAs that encourage citizens to ask questions and engage with us. Rewarding Candor: Ensure that public servants have an opportunity to air their concerns; be courageous and speak up when you perceive problems. Building a Culture of Trust An emphasis on openness and truth-telling builds trust with both the public and future generations. Better Policy Making: When decision-makers have a variety of viewpoints backed by accurate information, policy-making is more likely to reflect actual needs. Enhanced Public Engagement: Citizens participating in the process are more vested in the success of government goals. A Responsive Government: Open communication fosters public administration that adapts to the ever-changing needs of its citizens. The Road Ahead The process of creating both behavioral and cultural environments that promote openness and truth-telling is never complete, but honing those values, first and foremost, will help to create an administration that people trust to run efficiently and, most importantly, for their benefit.

If you choose not to celebrate our "freedom" on this day, you are not alone.

You're not alone if you don't want to celebrate our "freedom" today. When millions of people's fundamental rights are being attacked by unelected judges and our autonomy over our own bodies is being taken away, how can we as a nation celebrate freedom? when Republican politicians are battling tooth and nail to restrict the right to vote in their fascist attempts to seize control of our democracy? when the police that our taxes support are killing Black people and our transgender siblings? How can we honor our nation's freedom when, just three days prior, a Supreme Court tainted by MAGA granted presidents the authority of kings? This was not supposed to be our day. Rather than using today as a punishment, let's use it to visit with loved ones, spend time outside, and get enough of rest because we still have a long battle ahead of us.

Rethinking Urban Mobility: How Cities Can Ditch Double Taxation and Embrace Sustainable Scooters and E-bikes

In a time when micromobility offers an ever-growing network of fast, fun, and environmentally friendly ways to move around towns and cities, it's crucial to recognize the potential it holds. However, alarm bells should ring when successive local and state authorities appear to be shooting themselves in the foot by creating a maze of regulatory fees, taxes and barriers that hinder rather than encourage their adoption. By reviewing these structural fees, we can unlock micro-mobility's tremendous potential, enabling greater urban accessibility, reducing CO2 emissions, and making our cities more equitable and fairer for everyone. What the current system does is not just taxing micromobility twice over, it's also creating an unfair situation. First, every trip pays sales tax to the states, which scooter and e-bike riders then pay. Second, many cities also charge operating fees to micromobility companies, which are again passed on to the consumer through the price of fares. This creates more expensive, less convenient options for riders than driving cars that pay relatively lax gas taxes and no operating fees at all. This double taxation sets off a domino effect of problems. Discouragement of residents from choosing greener forms of transportation can hamper a city’s attempt to solve issues such as traffic congestion and pollution. It can also result in discrimination against low-income riders who rely on these forms of transportation. Most importantly, these fees can undermine cities' goals to foster sustainable transport modes. Cities should adopt a new philosophy of micro-mobility fees. Waiving operating fees for micromobility companies would translate directly into lower fares for the riders; cutting sales tax on trips would end the double taxation of micromobility; and tiered fees with lower costs for short trips or low-income riders would expand accessibility and promote greater adoption. Cities should also look at alternative sources of revenue beyond scooter and e-bike users, such as congestion pricing: setting fees on cars entering areas with high traffic to incentivize drivers to shift to micro-mobility users or reallocating some of the revenue to keep the infrastructure in good condition, or partnering with local businesses to provide scooter/e-bike users with discounts or free rides when they pay at the company. Such approaches would serve as additional income for businesses by attracting scooter/e-bikers at lower costs and providing more sanitary means of transport around the city. Long-term ridership can help multiply the benefits of micromobility, too. Providing subscription passes at discounted monthly or yearly rates to frequent riders can incentivize regular usage and boost ridership numbers. Cities can also partner with micro-mobility companies to offer reward programs on usage with incentives such as bringing down ride fees for riders who reach vital milestones (e.g., completing several trips per month). Lastly, fees should be determined based on data. Cities should use usage data about the frequency of use, distance traveled, and characteristics of the users to test how different fee schedules affect rider behavior. They can then pilot innovative fee structures in specific areas to test their impact on ridership and inform city-wide policies. In short, cities can continue to tax scooters and e-bikes ad nauseam, a form of double taxation that holds back the full potential and promise of these sustainable, last-mile transportation alternatives. Or cities can shift towards a more incentive-based system of municipal revenue, whereby citizens are motivated to ride rather than drive. Doing so will produce a greener urban ecosystem and a more progressive transportation system that benefits all.